yo people, persevere for your common tests k, dun let the trauma of the previous papers get to you when you do the next few papers.
And yes, it shd be said that diamond _HAS_ a giant covalent structure. you can't say that it is a giant cov structure. cos it isnt. its simply a chemical element. which possesses said giant cov. structure get it?
*sigh* and its not right to say that I2 is a simple molecular lattice. It HAS a simple molecular STRUCTURE.
and i dun even wanna talk abt the abuse of because, therefores, hence, and thus.
In the past, exams used to have this phrase in the instructions: "Candidates are to note that marks will be awarded for proper/appropriate use of language in expression of answers."
which really is an euphemism for marks will be deducted for bad language. :)
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
ughh
i'm so dead.. the marking is killing me.. and so many students have such a poor ability to express themselves,.. its as if when they do science, their english gets thrown out of the window...
very often i see statements like "diamond is a giant molecular structure"
the answers written are at times are not structured in a logical fashion, or similar points are repeated, or lots of irrelevant points are written while key points are omitted... ( these are the trying to smoke the examiner/just whack type of answers)
this is such a trying time!
very often i see statements like "diamond is a giant molecular structure"
the answers written are at times are not structured in a logical fashion, or similar points are repeated, or lots of irrelevant points are written while key points are omitted... ( these are the trying to smoke the examiner/just whack type of answers)
this is such a trying time!
Monday, June 26, 2006
Saturday, June 24, 2006
How to study for exams.
After observing students' performance for tests, revision tests, remedials, and doing a postmortem with them for why, even those who worked hard and are smart, don't do very well in exams, i've concluded that they are not preparing well for exams.( for the revision tests, which are a lvl std, most are getting 40/80)
I should say they find find it difficult to bridge the gap between theoretical facts and application/evaluation/problem solving. This is because they do not understand the following principle: learning to prepare for exams is not about just mugging, its also acquiring problem solving skills. In devising solutions to problems, its not just sufficient to arrive at the "final answer". All key factors should be addressed, and given due consideration. Problem solving skills are not just useful in exams, they are useful in a whole lot of situations in life...
I think in fact singaporean students tend to treat exams as a... i dunno how to say, as a....unnatural animal. what i mean is that to them exams are just exams and somehow not related to problem solving in real life. this is at the same time true and not true.
Under the old A lvls/ and even o lvl exam system, many singaporean students have learnt, and teachers have also encouraged, a drill approach with a mindset of "memorising" without real understanding, answers to questions (problems). to them, they do not need to understand why/how the answer is crafted in particular fashion. Students, witha desire to feel secure and to do well, as well as teachers even, are equally guilty. They want to be able to simply regurgitate facts, to supply a direct and PREMADE answer to any question. so that they will never be wrong.And they just want the final answer. And if the marking scheme requires the working, then the working is also part of the "final answer" to be mugged for.
This is not the right mindset, to exams, and indeed to life. This is , to me, one of the major shortcomings of our system. To highlight what i mean, I've met graduates, and postgraduates, in the course of doing research work.
Now the nature of research work should be.. RESEARCH! that means dealing with the unknown. So skills like analysis, evaluation, generalising, deduction, induction all need to be used. Suppose we want to investigate a certain system, what do we do? well we hypothesize about how the system might be like. We compare with perhaps similar sorts of examples in nature that we already know something about. We take a similar experiemental protocol for those systems and modify them based on our hypothesis abt the current system we want to study. we conduct our experiments, and record data. based on the data collected from our system, we analyse and deduce the actual state and properties of the system as well as evaluate out modified protocol. make assessments, modify the protocol somemore,and try again. sounds very tiring and challenging yes? as well it should be.
The thing is, the typical singaporean graduate doesnt want that. they want a secure job, make enough money.. that sort of thing( so the mindset they bring to their school as kids, they also bring to their life as adults). and if the govt wants to make research one of the economic engines, then thats what they'd do. so i've met people who say, they are at a loss or don't want to create a their own/new experiment protocol. they don't want to read up and trawl the libaries, journals, an internet for similar examples/info where they can learn from and adapt solutions. They wish for a boss who would think the whole thing through and just give them instructions on what to do. They just want to be .. robots.. secure robots that is. (same as students who do practicals. they just want to follow the lab manual. they do not question, or understand even, why certain steps, apparatus, and reagents are used. to me.. thats like being robots. you dont need intelligence to follow instructions. you just need training.) I always feel a strong urge to tell these people, dude, you are in the wrong job. research means dealing with the unknown duh. In fact I like bosses that simply share with me ,a goal, a vision, and perhaps offer some advice and teaching in terms of experiential stuff like where to start, like look for info, and perhaps important factors to consider and pitfalls to avoid. and then after that leave me alone to figure out the answer.
Ok haha i digress...i should address some of the major components of info mgmt and problem solving(and adapted as exam technique) on the next post.
I should say they find find it difficult to bridge the gap between theoretical facts and application/evaluation/problem solving. This is because they do not understand the following principle: learning to prepare for exams is not about just mugging, its also acquiring problem solving skills. In devising solutions to problems, its not just sufficient to arrive at the "final answer". All key factors should be addressed, and given due consideration. Problem solving skills are not just useful in exams, they are useful in a whole lot of situations in life...
I think in fact singaporean students tend to treat exams as a... i dunno how to say, as a....unnatural animal. what i mean is that to them exams are just exams and somehow not related to problem solving in real life. this is at the same time true and not true.
Under the old A lvls/ and even o lvl exam system, many singaporean students have learnt, and teachers have also encouraged, a drill approach with a mindset of "memorising" without real understanding, answers to questions (problems). to them, they do not need to understand why/how the answer is crafted in particular fashion. Students, witha desire to feel secure and to do well, as well as teachers even, are equally guilty. They want to be able to simply regurgitate facts, to supply a direct and PREMADE answer to any question. so that they will never be wrong.And they just want the final answer. And if the marking scheme requires the working, then the working is also part of the "final answer" to be mugged for.
This is not the right mindset, to exams, and indeed to life. This is , to me, one of the major shortcomings of our system. To highlight what i mean, I've met graduates, and postgraduates, in the course of doing research work.
Now the nature of research work should be.. RESEARCH! that means dealing with the unknown. So skills like analysis, evaluation, generalising, deduction, induction all need to be used. Suppose we want to investigate a certain system, what do we do? well we hypothesize about how the system might be like. We compare with perhaps similar sorts of examples in nature that we already know something about. We take a similar experiemental protocol for those systems and modify them based on our hypothesis abt the current system we want to study. we conduct our experiments, and record data. based on the data collected from our system, we analyse and deduce the actual state and properties of the system as well as evaluate out modified protocol. make assessments, modify the protocol somemore,and try again. sounds very tiring and challenging yes? as well it should be.
The thing is, the typical singaporean graduate doesnt want that. they want a secure job, make enough money.. that sort of thing( so the mindset they bring to their school as kids, they also bring to their life as adults). and if the govt wants to make research one of the economic engines, then thats what they'd do. so i've met people who say, they are at a loss or don't want to create a their own/new experiment protocol. they don't want to read up and trawl the libaries, journals, an internet for similar examples/info where they can learn from and adapt solutions. They wish for a boss who would think the whole thing through and just give them instructions on what to do. They just want to be .. robots.. secure robots that is. (same as students who do practicals. they just want to follow the lab manual. they do not question, or understand even, why certain steps, apparatus, and reagents are used. to me.. thats like being robots. you dont need intelligence to follow instructions. you just need training.) I always feel a strong urge to tell these people, dude, you are in the wrong job. research means dealing with the unknown duh. In fact I like bosses that simply share with me ,a goal, a vision, and perhaps offer some advice and teaching in terms of experiential stuff like where to start, like look for info, and perhaps important factors to consider and pitfalls to avoid. and then after that leave me alone to figure out the answer.
Ok haha i digress...i should address some of the major components of info mgmt and problem solving(and adapted as exam technique) on the next post.
i have a fragile ego.
I came across the brochure for ballet under the stars and thought of suggesting that as a class outing, so i smsed this girl.. call her CL
me: hey lets go for ballet under the stars!
CL: what, you mean for class outing right?
(i was thinking like duh .. of course.. but i decided to play a prank so....)
me: no, its just you and me.
after a looong pause..
CL: HUH?? why me????....<--------at this point i was like.. waaah wat a response.. like she was called up for detention or punishment.. like the prospect of going out with me was torture!!! *sigh*
white slip for CL the next time she's late. hmph.
haha actually i just laughed my head off. :)
me: hey lets go for ballet under the stars!
CL: what, you mean for class outing right?
(i was thinking like duh .. of course.. but i decided to play a prank so....)
me: no, its just you and me.
after a looong pause..
CL: HUH?? why me????....<--------at this point i was like.. waaah wat a response.. like she was called up for detention or punishment.. like the prospect of going out with me was torture!!! *sigh*
white slip for CL the next time she's late. hmph.
haha actually i just laughed my head off. :)
Thursday, June 22, 2006
The Idea of God
I was just chilling this afternoon and as usual when i chill, my thoughts start to wander off ... and I started think, how come I can never be as pious as other christians.. or for that matter as pious as any other person is to his/her own religion?
but then, I've never been atheist or gnostic- i truly believe in and love God... so i figured, its because i really treasure the idea of having God. To me, if there is no God, no eternity, no karma, then perhaps life will seem more pointless( ala john lennon's "imagine").. like whats the point of doing anything? in the end it all becomes dust... and whats the point of planning, or trying hard, or being good? just eat, drink and be merry. So yep there must be a God. And of course i've experienced God in my life.. tho i won't go too much into that... anyway..
But I don't want to be too near to God... i think his holiness will burn me...
and when i look around at the immense suffering brought about by religious fanaticism( wars, genocide, injustice to women etc etc,) , i wonder.. is it worth it? and almost every religion/cult has been guilty of bringing about suffering. but maybe its not the religion itself.. but its the people in the religion... imperfect human beings thinking that they are acting in the infallible will of whichever God the believe in, but in fact they don't know better than any other human being .. or perhaps they are downright worse, manipulating others to think that they alone possess special knowledge of the divine.
I'm so unholy; men are so evil, how can anyone ever say that they can execute the will of God? I'd rather just cherish the Idea of God.
but then, I've never been atheist or gnostic- i truly believe in and love God... so i figured, its because i really treasure the idea of having God. To me, if there is no God, no eternity, no karma, then perhaps life will seem more pointless( ala john lennon's "imagine").. like whats the point of doing anything? in the end it all becomes dust... and whats the point of planning, or trying hard, or being good? just eat, drink and be merry. So yep there must be a God. And of course i've experienced God in my life.. tho i won't go too much into that... anyway..
But I don't want to be too near to God... i think his holiness will burn me...
and when i look around at the immense suffering brought about by religious fanaticism( wars, genocide, injustice to women etc etc,) , i wonder.. is it worth it? and almost every religion/cult has been guilty of bringing about suffering. but maybe its not the religion itself.. but its the people in the religion... imperfect human beings thinking that they are acting in the infallible will of whichever God the believe in, but in fact they don't know better than any other human being .. or perhaps they are downright worse, manipulating others to think that they alone possess special knowledge of the divine.
I'm so unholy; men are so evil, how can anyone ever say that they can execute the will of God? I'd rather just cherish the Idea of God.
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
INTJ
Try this! http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
Your Type is INTJ
Introverted
Intuitive
Thinking
Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11
50
75
11
-----------------
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.
Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.
Your Type is INTJ
Introverted
Intuitive
Thinking
Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11
50
75
11
-----------------
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.
Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.
formatting
i really need to figure out this litle formatting glitch.. its so irritating.. sometimes its centred, other times its left or right justified.. grrr
up-update
21 Jun Make up revision test @ SR10: 10am to 1pm(includes break and gg thru the paper)
the following people are going:
from 3H:Changxun Debbie Jheeva Samuel Charissa YYY, mie, lawry, kenny
from 3R: kelly, natasha, natalie, angie, melu,
from 3N: Joash, Ryan David, Gerald, CZQ, Charlene, laila, aisha, teresen kristel+ fren,
from 7B: Sherine
23 June consultations
1100-1200 terese and abby
1300-1400 yanheng and angela
1430-1530 jheeva
1530-1700 melu and nat
Monday, June 19, 2006
updates
16 Jun:
1130am: 7B: paul n chen zhen
21 Jun Make up revision test @ SR10: 10am to 1pm(includes break and gg thru the paper)
the following people are going:
from 3H:Changxun Debbie Jheeva Samuel Charissa YYY
from 3R: kelly, natasha, natalie
from 3N: Joash, Ryan David, Gerald, CZQ, Charlene, laila, aisha,
from 7B: Sherine
22 Jun
filming of SPA video!
Hey people! we are thnking of making a SPA video! the vid will teach you all about the next skill coming up for exams. in this way, all students will get the same teaching (as compared to different tutors coverring their own classes) maybe we'll make it downloadable.
The video will be hipper than hip, cooler than cool, hotter than hot and MTVisque. What I need is:
1; suggestions for soundtrack. must be exciting k. and no propella heads or moby ala matrix or james bondish stuff.
2: if any of you are skilled in videop editing, we welcome you to volunteer! you won't get paid, but this is your chance to impress us and earn major brownie points....
23 Jun
The End of the Holidays!
*sob*!!!
11am : 3N: Terese and Abby
1pm: Yanheng and Angela
Oh yes, on a separate note, 3N will be getting a new chem tutor! he's a nice and enthusiastic guy & ex rafflesian. so yep I'm sure they will be in capable hands. ...I will miss them and their antics
More notes! haha no not chem notes.. just random stuff.. mostly to do with music...I just bot the Snow Patrol's latest album "Eyes open"..limited edition CD + DVD
http://www.snowpatrol.com/music/albums.aspx?pid=36
buy original!
1130am: 7B: paul n chen zhen
21 Jun Make up revision test @ SR10: 10am to 1pm(includes break and gg thru the paper)
the following people are going:
from 3H:Changxun Debbie Jheeva Samuel Charissa YYY
from 3R: kelly, natasha, natalie
from 3N: Joash, Ryan David, Gerald, CZQ, Charlene, laila, aisha,
from 7B: Sherine
22 Jun
filming of SPA video!
Hey people! we are thnking of making a SPA video! the vid will teach you all about the next skill coming up for exams. in this way, all students will get the same teaching (as compared to different tutors coverring their own classes) maybe we'll make it downloadable.
The video will be hipper than hip, cooler than cool, hotter than hot and MTVisque. What I need is:
1; suggestions for soundtrack. must be exciting k. and no propella heads or moby ala matrix or james bondish stuff.
2: if any of you are skilled in videop editing, we welcome you to volunteer! you won't get paid, but this is your chance to impress us and earn major brownie points....
23 Jun
The End of the Holidays!
*sob*!!!
11am : 3N: Terese and Abby
1pm: Yanheng and Angela
Oh yes, on a separate note, 3N will be getting a new chem tutor! he's a nice and enthusiastic guy & ex rafflesian. so yep I'm sure they will be in capable hands. ...I will miss them and their antics
More notes! haha no not chem notes.. just random stuff.. mostly to do with music...I just bot the Snow Patrol's latest album "Eyes open"..limited edition CD + DVD
http://www.snowpatrol.com/music/albums.aspx?pid=36
buy original!
Recent movie i just watched: Cars!
Its really funny, and thoughtful, and meaningful.. did i say its really funny? Pixar animation really has great production values.. you should all catch it! In fact I think we should make a learning journey out of it...
Winning isnt everything.. its the relationships that you build that give meaning to your life.
.. On a note about learning journey though, I'd like to suggest to the students from 3H: lets go for Ballet Under The Stars!
Paradise Falling
Performed by Sngapore Dance Theatre (SDT) (personal note: they are good, i've seen them before)
Music: Blue as the Turqoise Night of Neyshabur
Performed by : Yo-Yo Ma
http://www.singaporedancetheatre.com/performance/buts.asp
21 July Friday evening
its 18$ per tic: but we can get 15% discount if we order more than 5 tics, plus we can get a TOTE board arts grant subsidy of up to 60%. meaning you guys only need to pay 25% of 18$ = 4.50$
wanna go?
Other performances worth going:
Coldplay: Twisted Logic concert, 10 Jul 2006, Singapore Indoor Stadium
SIngapore Lyric Opera: The Marriage of Figaro by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
14-17 July 2006
Check them out at www.sistic.com.sg
What an exciting July! Every1 should go watch something esp after the very very exciting common tests :)
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Remedials, consultations, and revision tests
I'm posting this to consolidate whats taking place:
5 June:
Revision test 1 @LT2: A lot of absentees!!
Consultations:
3N: I was suppose to see some people for 3N, but they never turned up.
Darren & Hanxin: yes I know they are from 3N, but they made separate arrangements with me and I met them at about 1030 am
3H: Qingyuan was suppose to see me, but didnt bring his stuff, so I will see qingyuan on 19 Jun
12 June:
3H: some fellas were suppose to see me, but did not follow up and confirm, so cancelled.
14 June:
7B: 9 - 11 am @A21: arenes, and any other topics they might want-> chem bonding and organic chem
Paul Yap: needs to see me for consultation after that.
19 June:
Revision test 2 @LT2
21 June
Make up revision test @ SR10: 10am to 1pm(includes break and gg thru the paper)
the following people are going:
from 3H:Changxun Debbie Jheeva Samuel Charissa YYY
from 3R: nil
from 3N: Joash, Ryan David, Gerald (if more coming, please let me know!)
from 7B: nil
consultations
from 3R: Huanghuan, Melu and Nat at 2 pm
Thats what i have so far. I suspect that I've missed some out pls let me know!
And I'm suppose to meet Ryan from 3N but I don't have his contact. So Elizabeth if you are reading this please call him and get him to confirm with me. Thanks!
Anyone who wants to see me pls sign up via sms or email thx.
K i just came back from a short trip to phuket... now my skin's burnt and peeling.. ugh.
And on an interesting note, some fellas in ACJC have come up with a CLUBBING CIP! its so innovative!
check this out:
http://www.knowideas.com.sg/thehighlife/
5 June:
Revision test 1 @LT2: A lot of absentees!!
Consultations:
3N: I was suppose to see some people for 3N, but they never turned up.
Darren & Hanxin: yes I know they are from 3N, but they made separate arrangements with me and I met them at about 1030 am
3H: Qingyuan was suppose to see me, but didnt bring his stuff, so I will see qingyuan on 19 Jun
12 June:
3H: some fellas were suppose to see me, but did not follow up and confirm, so cancelled.
14 June:
7B: 9 - 11 am @A21: arenes, and any other topics they might want-> chem bonding and organic chem
Paul Yap: needs to see me for consultation after that.
19 June:
Revision test 2 @LT2
21 June
Make up revision test @ SR10: 10am to 1pm(includes break and gg thru the paper)
the following people are going:
from 3H:Changxun Debbie Jheeva Samuel Charissa YYY
from 3R: nil
from 3N: Joash, Ryan David, Gerald (if more coming, please let me know!)
from 7B: nil
consultations
from 3R: Huanghuan, Melu and Nat at 2 pm
Thats what i have so far. I suspect that I've missed some out pls let me know!
And I'm suppose to meet Ryan from 3N but I don't have his contact. So Elizabeth if you are reading this please call him and get him to confirm with me. Thanks!
Anyone who wants to see me pls sign up via sms or email thx.
K i just came back from a short trip to phuket... now my skin's burnt and peeling.. ugh.
And on an interesting note, some fellas in ACJC have come up with a CLUBBING CIP! its so innovative!
check this out:
http://www.knowideas.com.sg/thehighlife/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)